“The
ways of a superior man are threefold: virtuous, he is free from anxieties;
wise, he is free from perplexities; bold, he is free from fear.” Confucius
My review of Molly Geidel’s “Peace Corps Fantasies:
How Development Shaped the Global Sixties” appeared in the February 2016 issue
of Choice. I wrote:
This provocative,
well-researched, theory-driven cultural history is on solid ground in asserting
that Peace Corps volunteers were agents of a Cold War strategy designed to keep
underdeveloped countries within the global capitalistic orbit but on shakier
footing in attributing a motivation of US policy makers to gender anxieties and
fantasies of masculine heroes achieving “homosocial intimacy” with indigenous
protégés. Exposing the impossibility of true brotherhood among unequals,
Geidel quotes from Moritz Thomsen’s memoir “Living Poor” (1969). When an
Ecuadorian chicken farmer told Thomsen he should have more respect for local
practices, the Peace Corps volunteer replied, “But that’s why I’m here. To destroy your crazy customs.”
Disillusioned by the folly of the US imperialist venture in Vietnam, Peace
Corps veterans belonging to the Committee of Returned Volunteers advocated
abolishing the agency they once served. In Bolivia, population control
methods of sterilizing men and inserting IUDs in women led to the expulsion in
1971 of Peace Corps workers. Though, in the eyes of many, exemplars of
selfless US altruism, Peace Corps volunteers were mobilized, the author claims,
under the rubric of a modernization agenda whose side effect was cultural
eradication. Recommended: for students of foreign policy, modernization
theory, and masculine studies.
Geidel’s monograph is part of a growing genre of
historic inquiry called Masculine Studies.
As Helena Gurfinkel has written:
Masculinity Studies
(or, as it is also often called, Men’s Studies) is many things, but one thing
it is not: a rejoinder to, or repudiation of feminism. It owes to feminism an
enormous intellectual and political debt. In fact, it would not have existed
without feminism and its courage to question patriarchal power and privilege.
Men’s Studies scholars do not say, as many expect them to, “Enough of those
feminists; let’s say only good things about men from now on!” Instead, they
collaborate with feminists and scholars of race, class, and sexuality in asking
complex questions about the ways in which society constructs and controls us as
sexed and gendered individuals.
On the Internet are numerous syllabi for courses on Masculinity. Books frequently appearing on reading lists
include R.W. Connell’s “Masculinities” (1995), C.J. Pascoe’s “Dude, You’re a Fag:
Masculinity and Sexuality in High School” (2007), and Sociologist Michael
Kimmel’s “Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men” (2008). Kimmel has also co-edited with Michael A.
Messner a reader entitled “Men’s Lives” (Eighth edition, 2010). In his classes Kimmel often asks students to
describe a “good man” and then a “real man.” The contrasting responses are telling. One wonders whether IUN’s Women’s Studies
program evolves into Women and Men’s Studies like Black Studies became Minority
Studies. I hope not.
Many
universities offer classes dealing with masculinity in literature, film,
television, and other aspects of popular culture as well as theoretical courses
in the social sciences covering, among other things, changing perceptions of
masculinity over time in various societies.
I’ve even come across one on "Gay Masculinities." One of my favorite authors, bell hooks, has
written “We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity’ (2003), “The Will to Change:
Men, Masculinity, and Love” (2004), and many other provocative volumes on race
and gender.
Gwendolyn Brooks
The original “We Real Cool” was a 1959 Gwendolyn
Brooks poem reminiscent of Langston Hughes in its simplicity and rhyming
couplets, about seven dropouts at a pool hall rather than in school:
We real cool.
We
Left school. We
Lurk late. We
Strike straight.
We
Sing sin.
We
Thin gin. We
Jazz June.
We
Die soon.
Toni, Dave and fellow East Chicago Central grad Denzel
Smith flew to Lawton, Oklahoma, for Tamiya Towns’ graduation from Basic
Training at Fort Sill. Years ago, her
presence might have been threatening to male cohorts, but, hopefully, no more. A Fort Sill “Graduation Dress Code and
Etiquette” website warned family and friends not to come with noise-makers,
confetti, firearms, fireworks, alcohol or cigarettes and recommended bringing
binoculars, sunscreen, a hat and, finally, “respect,
support, and love for your soldier and his or her big accomplishment.”
The first episode of FX network’s “The People v. O.J. Simpson” opens with footage of
L.A. cops beating Rodney King in 1991 and rioting a year later after an
all-white jury acquitted the officers who assaulted him. It is director Ryan Murphy’s way of
demonstrating how Americans, for the most part, viewed the “Trial of the
Century” through the prism of race. I still
vividly recall watching the O.J. verdict announced on a TV in IUN’s student
union, where black people cheered while most whites seemed visibly shaken. Not me – I suspected a cocaine dealer. Actors John Travolta and David Schwimmer
assuming the roles of attorneys Robert Shapiro and Robert Kardashian reminded
me of the “Bizarro Jerry” Seinfeld
episode where Elaine starts hanging out with guys with an eerie resemblance to
Jerry, George, Kramer, and Newman. The
two most interesting characters so far are defense attorney Johnnie Cochran
(Courtney R. Vance) and prosecutor Marcia Clark (Sarah Paulson).
Slimy Republican Presidential candidate Ted Cruz
finished first in the Iowa caucus by employing several dirty tricks, including
spreading the rumor that Ben Carson was about to pull out of the race and
sending out a mailer with the headline “VOTING VIOLATION,” claiming that
people’s voting history is public record.
When Donald Trump cried Fraud, Cruz retorted: “We’re liable to wake up one morning and Donald, if he were President,
would have nuked Denmark.” Meanwhile
Trump continues on a self-destructive path, employing the F word and the phrase
“Don’t give a shit” in his latest rant and ridiculing Jeb Bush for dragging his
90 year-old mom out in the snow.
Mike Olszanski passed along this Indianapolis Star editorial:
The General Assembly
and Gov. Mike Pence’s refusal to extend the state’s civil rights law to include
sexual orientation and gender identity continues to tarnish Indiana’s image and
jeopardize long-term economic prosperity.
Last spring, after a firestorm from passage of the Religious
Freedom Restoration Act blew up in their faces, lawmakers pledged to address
legal protections for LGBT citizens in the next legislative session.
But after meeting privately Tuesday, Senate
Republican leaders decided to kill legislation that would have protected gay
Hoosiers from discrimination. In doing so, they not only failed lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender Hoosiers but also their families, friends, coworkers
and anyone else in our state who values equality.
Polls show that
Indiana’s elected leaders don’t accurately represent the will of 70 percent of
Hoosiers, who support adding sexual orientation and gender identity as
protected classes under the civil rights law. Lawmakers’ stubborn refusal to
listen to the will of the people could come at a high cost in an election year.
Indiana must be seen
as a state that spurns intolerance and bigotry. Yet the failure of legislation
this session means LGBT citizens can still be legally discriminated against in
most of the state. Sexual orientation or gender identity can be the basis for a
landlord to block housing, an employer to deny a job, or a business owner to
refuse service. All of that is permissible under current law.
From California Paul Kern reported: “After a couple of mornings staring at our
iPad and laptop at breakfast, we, old fossils that we are, decided we couldn’t
get along without a newspaper and so we have taken out a two-month subscription
to the Sacramento Bee.”
Learning that Assistant Director of Physical Plant Kevin Elmore (above) was
leaving, Hollis Donald got several dozen IUN staff members to sign a card that
wished him well and included this advice:
Remember
Life is a multitude of travels,
Arrows that point in many directions,
Starts and stops taking in many lessons.
The Engineers took all seven points from a team named
We’re Here, and I had a 668 series despite fading to 134 in the final game. Bob Robinson, back from a ten-day Caribbean
cruise, barely broke 100 in game one but finished with a 178. Opponent Jaime Rodriguez wore a t-shirt with
“Amistad” on the front – the name of his former team as well as a two-masted
schooner on which slaves led by Joseph Cinqué in 1839 successfully revolted
against a Spanish crew.
La Amistad
No comments:
Post a Comment